Improved time in range and postprandial hyperglycemia with canagliflozin in combination with teneligliptin: Secondary analyses of the CALMER study.

Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. Third Department of Internal Medicine, Hokkaido PWFAC Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Japan. Sapporo Diabetes and Thyroid Clinic, Sapporo, Japan. Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Sapporo Medical Center, NTT East Corporation, Sapporo, Japan. Diabetes Center, Manda Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. Department of Internal Medicine, Jiyugaoka Medical Clinic, Obihiro, Japan. Kurihara Clinic, Sapporo, Japan. Aoki Clinic, Sapporo, Japan. Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. Division of Diabetes and Obesity, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Journal of diabetes investigation. 2021;(8):1417-1424
Full text from:

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION We recently reported the beneficial effect of the combination of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor on daily glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Additional favorable effects of combination therapy were explored in this secondary analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The CALMER study was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial for type 2 diabetes mellitus involving continuous glucose monitoring under meal tolerance tests. Patients were randomly assigned to switch from teneligliptin to canagliflozin (SWITCH group) or to add canagliflozin to teneligliptin (COMB group). The continuous glucose monitoring metrics, including time in target range, were investigated. RESULTS All 99 participants (mean age 62.3 years; mean glycated hemoglobin 7.4%) completed the trial. The time in target range was increased in the COMB group (71.2-82.7%, P < 0.001). The extent of the reduction in time above target range was significantly larger in the COMB group compared with the SWITCH group (-14.8% vs -7.5%, P < 0.01). Area under the curve values for glucose at 120 min after all meal tolerance tests were significantly decreased in the COMB group compared with the SWITCH group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor combined with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor improved the quality of glycemic variability and reduced postprandial hyperglycemia compared with each monotherapy.

Methodological quality

Metadata